Sermon for Sunday June 16th – Four after Pentecost 2013

1 Kings 21:1-10, 15-21a
Luke 7:36-8:3

“I see you”

Naboth the Jezreelite had a vineyard in Jezreel, beside the palace of King Ahab of Samaria. And Ahab said to Naboth, ‘Give me your vineyard, so that I may have it for a vegetable garden, because it is near my house; I will give you a better vineyard for it; or, if it seems good to you, I will give you its value in money.’

That these verses are seemingly innocuous to us, betrays a poverty of theological imagination of the highest and most destructive order. That we can hear these words without a chill going down our spine shows how little we think of God. We think that Ahab’s request is perfectly reasonable – indeed we do not think it can possibly have anything to do with God – after all, isn’t this precisely how we live out our lives?

We see something someone has, and we ask if we might own it instead? I am aware locally of several instances of people or organisations looking at a piece of property – a house perhaps which stands on land which would be very useful to them, and so they make the home owners an offer, and like Ahab sulk when they don’t get their own way. After all, ‘Everyone has their price . . .’ Indeed we see this working itself out in many ways across the world. Governments and large corporations making offers to people to move them off their land, for large agricultural or power schemes. And when they don’t get their way . . . well if sulking is the worst they do, then the people have been fortunate. Much of our food and power production in the modern world is dependent on peoples being moved off their ancestral land, ‘for the greater good of all’ we say. And yet of course it is not Our land which people seek to acquire. It is Not Our land.

In a couple of weeks time, together with my family, I’ll be flying back to the UK. As part of our time there, we’ll spend a week in a remote coaching house, high in the mountains of Snowdonia, North Wales. As you approach the house you drive up a long broad valley with steep sided mountains rearing up to right and left. The hill to the left was made famous some 70 years ago now, when the man who farmed it wrote a book about his experiences

It is a fine and very enjoyable read, but I have to admit I am always put off it by the title “I bought a mountain”. It is I suggest presumptuous, indeed more than that, it verges on the blasphemous. It is surely incredible that anyone who has the remotest sensitivity to Holy Scripture would fail to think this way – for ‘The Earth is the Lord’s and all they that dwell there in’ Yes all land has an owner – the Lord. None of it is ours to buy or sell – but that is not how we see things . . .

One of the interesting things to consider as we approach the 200th anniversary of the first proclamation of the gospel in these lands, is that one reason that the Maori we so very open to the message of the Scriptures was precisely because the Bible teaches that no-one Owns the land. To Maori thinking, as to that of the Hebrews, it was plain. The land was not up for sale. Those first Pakeha migtrants were allocated space, and to farm, because we all need land to flourish. So Space was made, but never with our understanding of Ownership. For the Maori Understood, they Saw that no-one owned the land. Indeed it is a ridiculous idea, because one way or another everyone ends up as fertiliser for the land 🙂 but later the English began to sell the land. Essentially the heart of our many of our bicultural problems here in New Zealand are related to this difference in understanding.
As it was famously with Ghandi, so too with the Maori to some extent – both Saw, both Understood the gospel far better than those who proclaimed it. For several centuries the Western version of Christianity had become increasingly dissociated from the Creation. The word ‘The Earth is the Lord’s’ reduced to the level of a pious bumper sticker – having no concrete reference in the lives of believers. Ahab, in many ways represents Our view of Land, as commodity. The scriptures warn us against covetousness, but we like Ahab see and we desire . . .

But, Naboth responds to Ahab : ‘The Lord forbid that I should give you my ancestral inheritance.’ Now we have to be careful here – for we might think that Naboth ‘owns the land’ – in the way for example that part of my family had until about 30 years ago, farmed the same land for several generations. But no this is not quite the same. Rather the ‘inheritance of Naboth’ was that Land that God had distributed, so that in the end none would go without food. All would have, for want of a better phrase ‘the means of production’ – for the Land brings forth her increase – and thus we are blessed by God. ‘The LORD forbid!’ This was enshrined in The Key Law of the Old Testament – the One that Jesus comes to enact and of which I have spoken before – the Law of Jubilee. Jubilee recognised that some would do worse, some would do better, and thus some might find themselves having to pass their land to others in order to survive. BUT after 50 years All land reverted – without penalty. You didn’t have to pay to get it back – because it didn’t belong to the others in the first place. It belonged to God. We do not believe this.

So Ahab is transgressing the law of God in seeking to obtain the land from Naboth in the first place. Naboth knows, he must not give away, and he definitely must NOT sell it. He must not make that which God has given to him a means of dishonest gain. For that in truth is what it is. We cannot even begin to comprehend this, how far has our perception, our apprehension of the Living God evaporated from our consciousness that we hear the opening verses of the reading and do not quake in our boots – we do not cry out in horror at the blasphemous acquisitiveness of Ahab. We just don’t get it. Oh yes we get the horror of what happens next – but we are blind to the appalling sinfulness of the request – because it is how we live out our own lives.

Ahab views the land, and wants it for himself. That is Sin – and it still is. Now I could give you many and varied examples of this going on all around us – suffice to say that acquiring land is how much of modern commerce and trade goes on. Interestingly there is in the scriptures a constant if quiet judgement of trading, which occasionally bubbles to the surface as in this tale. we think nothing of it. We have lost sight of God. And thus also our neighbour.

Indeed it is the evil genius of the modern world that it hides the neighbour from us. and it is why money is so important to us. For Money is a mechanism of disconnection from the other – everyone has their price. When we go to buy something apart from courtesies, we have no interest whatsoever in the person from whom we buy – we pay its value in money – the human is hidden. Indeed of course so much that we buy we do not buy from those who produce. Who made the clothes we wear? Unless you buy all your food at the farmers market, then it is highly unlikely you know who grew it. We certainly don’t know anyone involved in the production of our food in the biblical sense – that you Know them we eat with them, we are their neighbour. But even the act of buying and selling itself denies the other. Ultimately it denies God. how can we pay anyone for anything if the Earth is the Lord’s?? We have devised a way of living which denies the fundamental truth, that Everything belongs to God – and thus also we lose sight of our neighbour. We think that the answer to hunger in the world is better structures – but in reality it is the necessary softening of hearts of those who dwell in fine houses and dine sumptuously each day – to pick up on a later story of Jesus.

And losing sight of God and neighbour is at once the key theme of both this reading and our gospel, and also the heart of our human plight. Thus Jesus is the one who comes to restore sight to the blind. And to See God, is also to see ourselves not only in relationship to God, not only in relationship to others, but in relationship to the whole of creation. We live lives of disconnection from Creation and our neighbour which would have been unimagineable but a few generations ago. We think we can buy mountains, indeed we think we can buy anything if only we have the money. We are oblivious to the impact of others of our decisions. We mat say – ‘this is my land’ – ‘this is my mountain’ even . . . And God laughs us to scorn . . . We are called to a deep deep repentance. Before we can accept the life giving word as the Baptiser says, our hearts must be prepared. ‘You have two cloaks, your neighbour has none’ Unless we are repentant we cannot hear the Life giving word of Christ. Our deceiving hearts block the path of Grace.

At least Ahab had to look Naboth in the face! At least he was tormented by the outcome, and at least he repented – although sadly our reading stopped short of that point. Our lives are disconnected, from the land, from one another and thus from God. It is one reason why I am increasingly saying that as Christians we are ‘against the Spiritual’ – for ‘the Spiritual’ is a way in which modern man escapes the concrete responsibility and necessary repentance he has to his neighbour and to creation. We ‘spiritualise the gospel’ – we sing pietistic hymns about how sweet the name of Jesus sounds – but we do not obey Jesus. We do not See him. we do not know him. And I admit freely and without any pride whatsoever that I know much of my own failings in this regard.

I entitled this sermon – ‘I see you’. Years ago a tutor at theological college told us that we in the West say – ‘How are you?’ when we meet others. But in many African cultures people say ‘I See you’. The other day, in Auckland I was involved in a mihi for the first time and shared a Hongi with several people. I was told that some people looked the other in the eye when pressing noses – I am someone who does look people in the eye – it was a powerful experience – I fully understand why the Maori understand it to be a sharing of divine life. And of course once you have so shared Hongi, you are no longer manuhiri [visitors], you are now tangata whenua – one of the people of the land, sharing in all that that means – sharing in life – Sharing – neighbours in the biblical sense.

Our gospel reading at first sight about foregiveness and love – which it is – is also about the associated theme of hospitality and sharing in life. Jesus asks Simon the Pharisee, ‘Do you see this woman?’ ‘Do you see her?’ Ahab Sees the Land with covetous eyes. “I want that!!” He only sees Naboth purely in terms of his realtionship to the land which Ahab erroneously thinks he owns. Simon sees the woman – purely as a sinner. He has no relationship with her and indeed does not want one with her. One can only wonder at his reaction if he had to give her a hongi! Simon stands afar off. The woman draws close to Jesus.

It is worth noting that the story doesn’t make the sense we expect it to. Jesus uses the love of the woman for him to teach Simon a story about forgiveness – if we read it closely the dynamic is staggering, in her drawing near to Jesus she is forgiven. Her love for Jesus is as much the trigger for forgiveness as it is the result of it. Jesus only speaks the words ‘Your sins are forgiven’ AFTER she has wept over his feet and dried them and it is not entirely clear whose benefit it is for – indeed all we hear is the reaction of the others in the house. She has entered relationship with Jesus – She loves him. As in the story of jesus and Peter which we have mentioned several times since easter – there is no act of penitence – all there is is love. Do you love me.

To Love is to welcome the other – to identify with the other. To identify them in their freedom. Love is never coercive. It involves no ownership of the other. Rather it is a free sharing in the life of the other freely given. It is all gift. The Biblical word is Grace. Unfortunately we are heirs to such a distorted tradition that we imagine Grace is purely something which exists in relationship to our relationship with God. But aside from our relationship with creation and our neighbour we cannot know God. The Land is Gift. It is not to be bought or sold, indeed it cannot. If we do not see this, we do not see. Every person we meet is gift to us, as the woman was to Jesus. To reduce her to a moral problem, or as in the case of Naboth a difficult trader – is to fail to see them. Do we see?

Through the BIble in a Year – June 16

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 23-24; Rev 22; Psalm 60-61

We come to the final chapter of Revelation. In a sense the End of Scripture – although by no means the end of our year of readings. Here we find once more a river, and the tree that our forebears ignored – the tree of Life.

It is in many regards a wonder full thing that these verses close the canon, not least because the place of Revelation within the canon of Scripture was not always certain in the early years of the church. It belinged as we have seen to that line of scriptures called Apocalyptic, and others well known to the early Christians faded from view over the first couple of hundred years of the life of the church, leaving Revelation as The Apocalyptic scripture in the New Testament (perhaps we might also squeeze Jude in there as well?)

Certainly it makes the finest of ‘endings’ – with the reader focussed on the hope and expectation of seeing Christ.

Amen. Come Lord Jesus! is our prayer – perhaps the culmination of all prayer

Through the Bible in a Year – June 15

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 21-22; Rev 21; Psalm 58-59

Again we come upon a conundrum in the Scriptural account which we cannot simply ignore

In the Samuel account of the David story = we are told the LORD incited David to number the people. The Chronicler puts it at the door of the Satan.

There are several issues at point here. Firstly there is the question of what the author is trying to do. The Chronicler is writing in all likelihood much later than the author of Samuel. As we have seen there is a desire not to besmirch the royal name, by not mentioning David’s theft of Bathsheba. Certainly in a sense the Chronicler could be seen to be doing the same with regard to the name of God. Satan, along with all the angelic beings is in some accounts thought to emerge later in the tradition of Israel. His role as we know is veiled to some regards – certainly the opening chapters of Job suggest so. He is seen in some account as a free agent, in others a servant of the purposes of God. In a sense these two are not wholly irreconcilable.

But, and secondly, such texts do not allow us to have a simplistic approach to Scripture. ‘The Bible says . . .’ is always a line to be taken with fear and trembling – and here is one clear expression of why – for ‘The Bible says two things which to our ears sound irreconcilable’. Of course, we are also reminded that the Heart of the message of Scripture is that which we seek to hear. It is why it is Always good to read Scripture in company – none of us have our own personal hotline to the thoughts of the God whose ways and thoughts are not ours. We need to learn to hear the Word – and we do that in a community of disciples, committed above all to following Jesus, The Word made flesh.

 

Through the Bible in a Year – June 14

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 18-20; Rev 19-20; Psalm 56-57

Our readings in the Old Testament are ‘chronologically’ arranged. That is that the texts are read in a way that is arranged with the flow of time, the story of God’s people. Thus we shall soon be reading the prophets who denounced the kings of Israel and Judah, as we also read of the downfall of those same kings.

Of course, as we are all aware, the Old Testament contains many different types (genres) of writing. There is poetry and prayer (Psalms and Song of Songs), there are sayings (proverbs), there are theological tales (Jonah and Job for example), and then there is ‘historical narrative’.

And therein lies a difficulty for us – for there is history and there is history. Who writes the history influences what is included, and in the case of our reading today, what is left out.

We read the words ‘In the spring of the year, the time when kings go out to battle . . .’ and immediately we are in familiar territory, having just read exactly the same words in 2 Samuel 11 . . . but the story does not continues the same.

The Chronicler is not interested in David’s personal history – he is telling the story of the great King of Israel with no interest in his personal character, unlike the author of Samuel. Here the story goes on without missing a step and were it not for Samuel, we would never have known of David’s theft of Bathsheba

Does it matter?

Through the Bible in a Year – June 13

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 16-17; Rev 17-18; Psalm 55

At the heart of the Old Testament is the theme of ‘right worship’. From the strange story of the Offerings of Cain and Abel, through the stories of the Patriarchs and coming to a focus in the Monarchy of the People of God – Right Worship – Worship in accordance with the God who makes himself known to us is central and the key interpretative element on which so much of the narrative hinges.

Thus David of course desires to make a house for the ark of the covenant – he seeks to to right in his worship of God.

At the heart of the story of course is the fundamental question, Who Is God? Right worship needs to be directed aright. Right Worship is a reflection of Divine Glory – it is that for which we are made, to make visible the Life of the God in whose image we are created. Thus worship of anyone or anything else is prohibited not in an arbitrary way, but because it denies who we are. It is death dealing.

Thus in our reading from Revelation, we see the bitter fruit of wrong worship. ‘Babylon the Great’ has made herself great; she has made herself an object of worship. She has made herself the great provider – she has traded to exalt herself, to make of herself a great and mighty nation. As for Babylon, be she Rome or Jerusalem, or be she any other nation, there is only one fate

Only One is great upon the Earth, the one who offers right worship to God. What is Any nation in comparison with Christ, the one who in himself is the Tabernacle of God.

Generosity

Following a most helpful conversation this morning, through which I developed a far richer appreciation of the background  to the unique ‘Three Tikanga’ structure of the Anglican church here in New Zealand, I was led to think more and more about several things. Partnership, Sharing and ‘Generosity’.

It comes to me that true generosity only begins when we learn what it is to share of ourselves. In the context of most of us, this means, when we are stripped of things and money except that which is essential to our own well-being – the necessary food and clothes and shelter. Then when we share, we are giving of ourselves truly sacrificially.

There are many words we use carelessly, especially those of us who have much, and I am most definitely one of those. We speak of ‘sacrificial’ giving. But such giving is almost always out of our excess, after we have looked to our own ‘needs’, which may include such fripperies as vacations or a new car. Giving out of our abundance is not generosity as biblically understood. Christ comes amongst us divested of everything. It is out of this emptiness of possession he gives All he has, to us and to the Father.  That is Generosity.

The story of the widows mite needs to be read in the light of this ‘divested generosity’ of the Son of God.

Through the Bible in a Year – June 12

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 14-15; Rev 15-16; Psalm 53-54

Revelation 15 and 16 juxtapose two themes – both of which have largely been erased from our consciousness. The Glory of God in Chapter 15 as expressed in ‘the song of Moses, the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb’, and the Wrath of God.

Of course, sophisticates [or perhaps that should be Sophists??] that we are, we tend to think we have only done away with the latter. The Wrath of God is something which we flee from, either in reality or metaphor. Despite the clear evidence to the contrary in the Gospels and in the person of Jesus of Nazareth there revealed, we tend to think it rather uncivilised to pay much attention to the Dies Irae – the Day of Wrath. Our forebears thought otherwise and of course the Dies Irae played a significant part in funeral liturgies.

We perhaps tend to think that by and large we do a pretty good job with glorifying God – but the reality of it is that it is precisely the desecration of the Image of God that is the root of the Wrath of God, the desecration of the Image in humankind. There is somewhat of an irony in that those who seem to make a lot of noise about justice, underplay the Wrath of God. Whilst those who perhaps fail to apprehend the Glory of God in ‘a human fully alive’, to quote Iranaeus, make most of the Wrath of God.

Orthodox faith holds these in utterly rational agreement.

Why is God angered by sin? Because it defiles his image in which we are created. Sin cannot be understood apart from this – it is no mere adherence to a seemingly arbitrary moral code. It is that which has ‘marred Your image in us’, it is the destruction of that which God has declared Good!

God’s wrath is over what we have made of ourselves – defiled ourselves, and then so often called it Good.

We give Glory to God that we might better see that which we truly are, and be all the more appalled at what we have made of ourselves.

Through the Bible in a Year – June 11

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 12-13; Rev 13-14; Psalm 52

The ‘Number of the Beast’ has of course been a matter for endless speculation over the years. Put simply, we don’t know – we might perhaps surmise that it is Nero, but that is to assume that Rome and not for example faithless Jerusalem is in view in this book.

One lesson perhaps we all need to learn is that there is much in the pages of Scripture which we may never have access to. That there are parts of it which would be obvious to the first hearers of the message, but to us are lost as we know so little of their context. In part this should come as no surprise to those who are aware of cultural diversity and that there is much of the culture of other peoples today which we cannot comprehend.

The danger is that these parts of scripture become a distraction from that, the meaning of which is all too plain.

Perhaps the work of the Beast is to keep us so distracted?

Through the Bible in a Year – June 10

The scheme for May – June can be found here

1 Ch 10-11; Rev 11-12; Psalm 51

Psalm 51 is the opening prayer of the morning office of the Orthodox Church. It reminds us first thing in the morning that we are sinners in need of Grace. It is as good a way to wake as any, in at least three regards. Firstly it places God at the heart of all things. ‘Against you and you only have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight’.

Remembering that the context of this Psalm is David’s theft of Bathsheba and his murder of Uriah, this might seem a little odd. We are all too focussed on those we can see as opposed to the one we cannot see. We fear the consequences of sin in terms of people being angry with us and more, rather than the devastation it does to our relationship with God.

Secondly it reminds us that God’s grace is always forthcoming to those who repent – literally turn around, and face him. For unlike those who might seek at least a tooth for a tooth, and humans are poor judges of justice, and worse of mercy, he wears a smiling face and loves to see us return.

Before we are half done with this prayer – he is running to meet us.  Perhaps THE reason to pray it . . .

Through the Bible in a Year – June 9

The scheme for May – June can be found here

2 Sa 23-24; Rev 9-10; Psalm 50

The concluding chapters of the story of David are in some regards quite perplexing. We see the LORD inciting David to count Israel – there is an echo here of his unexplained anger against Moses in Exodus 4. Of course we say it is unexplained, but Moses has doubted God, and David is a man of much blood.

So the text tells us in effect, do not take the name of the LORD your god in vain. Faith is not a game

And then the whole question of numbering? Of course in our age this seems ever so strange? What can be wrong with seeking to know the size of your forces, or the extent of your provisions??? But once more we are undone. Again we turn our back on the Living God, the one who Owns Everything. Why does what we have matter in the least?

Except of course for us, in truth it means all but everything – and it is in that ‘all but’ that our hope lies, the sign that we have not entirely turned away from God